Peer Review Process

Engineering International follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, and scholarly integrity. In this system, reviewer identities remain confidential from authors, and author identities remain concealed from reviewers throughout the evaluation process.

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess relevance to the journal’s scope, formatting compliance, research quality, and publication ethics requirements. Manuscripts that successfully pass the preliminary review are assigned to an editor or section editor for further evaluation.

Submissions considered suitable for peer review are forwarded to independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, clarity, methodology, technical quality, scholarly contribution, and relevance to the journal.

Based on reviewer comments and editorial assessment, manuscripts may be:

• Accepted without revision
• Accepted with minor revisions
• Returned for major revisions and resubmission
• Rejected

Where major revisions are required, revised manuscripts may undergo an additional round of peer review. The final publication decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or the assigned editorial authority.

Engineering International is committed to maintaining fairness, confidentiality, academic integrity, and recognized publication ethics standards throughout the peer review and editorial process.